Small Operational Mistakes that Delay Big Listings: Part 1

Part 1 | Part 2

In capital markets, success is built on discipline, not luck. Markets will reward a strong story and healthy demand but only if the execution workstreams run clean. In practice, deals rarely slip because of valuation or investor appetite. They slip because of operational errors that appear small in isolation and become material when timelines compress.

A U.S. listing, whether through a traditional IPO, reverse takeover or de-SPAC transaction, requires precise coordination among management, auditors, legal counsel, the financial advisor, underwriters, and regulatory authorities. Each party operates on a tightly coordinated timeline. Even minor administrative oversights, such as an outdated audit report, incomplete shareholder register, or unsubmitted exchange form, can disrupt the entire process and lead to costly rescheduling.

The following sections highlight several recurring operational pitfalls that have delayed listings and outlines practical measures to mitigate them.

1. Insufficient Planning and Readiness

A common yet underestimated cause of delay in public listings is insufficient early-stage planning. Many issuers underestimate the time required to upgrade internal infrastructure, governance frameworks, and reporting discipline expected in a public company.

Comprehensive preparation extends far beyond financial performance. Strong issuers build a readiness calendar months before filing. They align management responsibilities early, run financial tie-outs ahead of schedule, and treat disclosure preparation as part of strategic planning, not a compliance chore. Listings that start with operational discipline finish within their intended window.

Execution Lesson:

Strong issuers begin the listing readiness process well before formal filings. This involves setting realistic internal timelines, identifying potential bottlenecks across workstreams, and ensuring early coordination among management, auditors, counsel, and the financial advisor. A proactive and front-loaded discipline not only prevents operational delays but also allows the company to approach the market with stronger governance, clearer disclosures, and greater investor confidence.

2. Inadequate Accounting Framework Preparation

A recurring cause of delay, especially for foreign private issuers, is failing to convert financial records into U.S.-accepted accounting frameworks early in the process. Many foreign companies maintain books under home-country standards that the SEC does not recognize. Domestic issuers must report under U.S. GAAP, and qualified FPIs may use IFRS as issued by the IASB. Any issuer outside these frameworks must convert, restate, and reconcile multi-year financials before filing.

When this conversion starts late, it becomes a critical-path bottleneck. Restating historical numbers, revising accounting policies, and producing GAAP- or IFRS-compliant disclosures consume significant time and resources. A slow conversion delays drafting, stalls the audit, and pushes the entire listing schedule back.

Execution Lesson:

Companies should begin the accounting-standards conversion process early and ensure that internal teams or external advisors are adequately prepared. Proper planning reduces the risk of downstream delays and allows the issuer to progress through SEC review with greater efficiency and accuracy.

3. Failure to Maintain Audit Currency

Audit staleness is one of the fastest ways to lose a listing window. The SEC and U.S. exchanges impose strict requirements on the recency of financial statements. For domestic issuers, audited financials included in a registration statement must generally not be older than 134 days from the balance-sheet date. For foreign private issuers (FPIs), audited financial statements must generally not be older than 12 months at the time the registration statement becomes effective^[1]. If more than nine months have passed since the fiscal year end, unaudited interim financial statements must also be included^[2].

When issuers fail to anticipate extended SEC comment periods, audits can become “stale,” necessitating a full refresh or reissuance of financial statements. This typically requires additional audit procedures, updated consents, and amended filings, each adding weeks to the schedule and incremental costs.

Execution Lesson:

Strong issuers establish an internal audit refresh calendar early on that aligns with the anticipated SEC comment timeline. This calendar is usually developed jointly with auditors to identify potential audit-update windows in advance. Additionally, draft versions of updated financials are encouraged early on in the event an audit refresh becomes necessary, so that it can be executed quickly without disrupting the broader transaction schedule.

Author:

WK Khor

Analyst

 

References:

[1] ARC Group (2025): Implications of Being a Foreign Private Issuer – ARC Group

[2] SEC (2011): gov | Financial Reporting Manual